Info Pie - Part 2

Info Pie

As long as the general integrity of the Info Pie model is maintained, there is almost no way for the public to escape its deception.  They will remain trapped in an artificial matrix of false reality similar to the one portrayed in the movie "Matrix".  So how did I escape?  How did others escape, like the whistleblowers that try so desperately to wake up humanity to its unbelievable plight?  We've seen how investigating the "true" 20% of the Info Pie reinforces the illusion, as does, amazingly enough, investigating the "false" 30% portion.  The only thing left to investigate is the 50% portion that is withheld, and how can anyone investigate something that they are not allowed to know?

Like the whistleblowers themselves, and largely thanks to them, I escaped by uncovering small portions of the withheld information.  You don't need much.  Two or three hidden facts may be all the evidence you need to falsify one thing in the 30% portion of the Info Pie, and once you've done this a few times, you begin to suspect that everything in there could be a lie.  And the more hidden information you uncover, the more you realize that it is indeed nothing but a pack of lies.  The key to breaking out of the matrix is to uncover and piece together the withheld information with the skill and tenacity of a crime detective.  Because it is a crime, and we are the victims.

The Info Pie model is so effective that it is used not only in mass media, but in religion and government as well.  Not even education is exempt.  Much of history is hidden, which in turn has allowed a large portion of history to be fabricated in a way that can no longer be disputed.  The same goes for science.  Why would scientific discoveries need to be hidden?  Why was Nikola Tesla's work (free energy) confiscated and classified upon his death nearly 60 years ago?  Why was Stanley Meyer and his work (a car that ran on water) destroyed and never heard from again?  Why is so much of our science classified today?  Why has NASA hidden information, encrypted transmissions, and doctored pictures?

Now, at least, you know enough to question why.

Sylvia says

Psychics need not apply?

Of course I don't believe what psychics say.  As a boy, I was busy doing experiments with my chemistry set in my basement laboratory located in a closet under the stairs.  I experimented with making gunpowder, looked into nitroglycerin, but ended up making smoke bombs and selling them to the other kids in the neighborhood, which was quite the profitable business.  I was horrified when my mother found out and insisted that I return the money.  I never did, because that was simply too unjust, since the smoke bombs had already been consumed and enjoyed by the buyers.  When not in the lab or at the drugstore purchasing chemicals, I collected rocks of every type, learning their chemical composition and properties.  Science was my religion, books were my teachers, and the library was my treasury.  In high school, I discovered physics and computers, and the future seemed to spill open.  I went on to study physics and chemistry in college, while grabbing as much psychology and French as I could squeeze into five years.  I was the quintessential scientist that no psychic could sway.

I also read lots of biographies as a boy that influenced me, including George Washington Carver, the humble but gifted scientist who worked with peanuts, and Harry Houdini, the magician and escape artist.  Houdini in particular was a serious researcher of psychics, and his knowledge of the magic trade allowed him to expose them as charlatans and frauds every time, despite his burning desire to find a legitimate psychic.  The lesson was that both physics and psychics provided answers, but only one of them was right.

So why am I reading a book by psychic Sylvia Browne called "Secrets and Mysteries of the World"?  An unscientific friend of mine is a big fan of Sylvia, and when I rattle on about the things I've seen on the Internet about secret labs and projects, UFOs, EBEs, constructions on the Moon and Mars, and other esoteric subjects, my friend often chimes in with "Sylvia says..."  Naturally, I'm hardly interested in what Sylvia has to say, who gets much of her information from her spirit guide named Francine.  After a while, though, I couldn't help but notice that Sylvia always had something to say about the same thing I was studying, like crop circles, ancient civilizations, or catastrophic planetary changes.  So when my friend gave me the book with an itemized list of pages to read about what Sylvia had to say on these subjects, I relented.

Strange as it may sound, given that Sylvia and I come from completely different foundations, many of our tentative conclusions are quite similar.  The chapter on "The Pyramids and the Sphinx", which was not even on my itemized list, was the most interesting for me, and by the end of that chapter, I had gained a passing respect for her "imaginary" friend, Francine.  Yes, it's true.  How could a voice in Sylvia's head win me over?  It was a single sentence that Sylvia throws in "as an aside" enclosed in parentheses, something that Francine had mentioned to Sylvia related to reincarnation:

"As an aside, Francine did say that anyone who comes to this planet is the bravest of the brave and learns faster than anywhere else because this is the insane asylum of the universe."

Francine, we need to meet.