Fiat reality

He's GOOD.
(Just like Obama.)

(The following excerpts are highlights from this discussion on political ponerology.)

The system that is in place is a pathological system that is at odds in a very profound way with the being or nature of most people.  People of conscience are being ruled by people with no conscience.  This fact is the primary injustice and is the basis for the other ills of society.

(As you read the following partial list of sociopathic traits (more here and here), think of how they apply to Hitler, Mussolini, Bush, Cheney, Blair, Obama, etc.)

• An obvious trait of sociopaths is the complete lack of conscience.  They lack any sense of remorse or empathy with others.  They cannot feel the suffering of others.


• Sociopaths are experts at using talk to charm and hypnotize their prey.


• Sociopaths are irresponsible.  Nothing is ever their fault.


• Another trait - and a very important one - is their ability to control the flow of information.


• Sociopaths are incapable of deep emotions.


• Sociopaths are experts in knowing how to push our buttons, to use our emotions against us.

Lobaczewski's contribution is his analysis of the way the different types of psychopathic types work together to form a system where people who are clinically pathological have the positions of power and rule over people who are psychologically normal.

Early in the book, Lobaczewski describes his experiences in university where he first encountered the phenomenon.  He went into the library to get some books on the question of psychopathy and found to his amazement that they had all been removed!  This fact demonstrates a self-awareness of their difference amongst at least some of them, and in the case of Poland under communism, of those in a position of power highly enough placed to get books removed from the university library.

One cannot really designate the issues that confront us today as "political", using the ordinary names of political ideologies because, as noted above, pathological deviants operate behind a complete mask, by deception and other psychological tricks which they practice with great cunning.

If, as Lobaczewski suggests, the essential psychopaths recognize each other and are able to work together to achieve common aims for their "para-specific species", as opposed to our interests, then we even have a mechanism for explaining a control structure that extends back in time, back into the mists when the first psychopaths set up the first pathocracy.  All of a sudden, theories which until now have been belittled as "conspiracy theories" can be looked at in a new light, with a new means of explaining how they could exist.  This, I think, is a very important area for further research.

We won't really know what human nature is until the pathocratic influence is removed and a truly human society, that is, one led by and with values in accordance with our highest nature, our conscience, is able to be founded.

The psychopath doesn't lie in the way a normal person lies.  Psychopathic lying is not mere deception, it is "creating reality" so that it conforms to the psychopath's wants.

Let me try to explain.  The psychopathic reality exists by fiat:  they declare things to be so and expect others to accept them.  To them, these declarations represent what reality should be, or at least what they think others should accept as reality.  "If I say it is so, why shouldn't people believe me?"  Just as intelligence is merely an instrument used by the psychopath to fulfill his whims, "facts" are instruments to be used and abused in the same pursuit.

Experience has shown no matter what we say, no matter what we point out, no matter how much evidence is given, it has no meaning for psychopaths.  They have one goal:  to fool us into classifying them as normal humans so they can continue to deceive us, control us and use us for their own power and glory because that is what makes them feel good.

How do you say "no" when the media is completely controlled by other pathocrats?  You can take to the streets, as millions of people did before the invasion of Iraq, but that doesn't matter because the pathocratic political leaders really don't care what people think.  They could care less if there are thousands or millions of people protesting their policies - they have the military and scary weapons at their disposal.  The media, then, distorted the message of those who dissented and painted them as traitors.  They are still painted as traitors four years on and after it has become plain as day that the war was wrong and that Bush and company lied on every point.

The majority of people have had their consciences crushed, have accepted so many compromises, that they are incapable of thinking or feeling things correctly.  They believe that there are countless numbers of Islamic fundamentalists ready to bomb their homes and schools, no matter how absurd that idea really is, and in spite of the fact that the majority of such bombings are false flag operations.  The well established fact that intelligence agencies carry out bombings and then blame their opponents - it is impossible to argue that this type of thing is not regular practice - becomes less believable to people in the United States, the UK, and elsewhere, than the fairy tale that there are hundreds of Islamic fundamentalists ready to blow themselves up in the name of Allah!

Think back to what Lobaczewski writes about the befuddled thinking that occurs when someone is in the presence of a psychopath.  Via the media, that befuddlement spreads beyond immediate personal contact and becomes a plague on society as a whole.  Society itself becomes diseased.

Those individuals who think that change can be effected via legal or political processes fail to understand that both the law and politics, by and large, are created and controlled by pathological types, and are set up for their benefit, not the benefit of the ordinary human being.  So it is that law and politics are insufficient avenues for counteracting a pathological society that has been created by the efforts and influence of deviants.

So, I'll say it again - and keep saying it - until the knowledge and awareness of pathological human beings is given the attention it deserves and becomes part of the general knowledge of all human beings, there is no way that things can be changed in any way that is effective and long-lasting.  That is the first order of business and if half the people agitating for Truth or stopping the war or Bush or whatever would focus their efforts, time and money on exposing psychopathy, we might get somewhere.

When you are dealing with psychopaths, you are dealing with the criminal mind and when such minds are in positions of absolute power - as they are today - there is nothing to restrain them - and nothing will restrain them, you can take that to the bank.

We need to learn how to say no to the manipulations.  That means we need to learn the ways we are manipulated and refuse to do the dance.

And so it is that identifying the psychopath, ceasing our interaction with them, cutting them off from our society, making ourselves unavailable to them as "food" or objects to be conned and used, is the single most effective strategy that we can play.