Freedom of (censored)

Where freedom is censored.

Speaking of utter insanity, my latest blog got me quietly "disappeared" from a site called Fighting For Liberty today.  Allegedly, my mentioning "alien spacecraft" touched a nerve, so my blog was censored (although I suspect it was the blog's ending that really touched the nerve).  I got an unbelievably hypocritical email containing several veiled threats, and when I responded, the hypocrite pulled the rug out from under me by suspending my entire account.  I've included the emails below for your enjoyment and edification.

And these are the people supposedly fighting for liberty?!  Things are a lot worse than I imagined....

---

The blog in question (a copy posted on another site) is here.

Email:  From Guy Razer to Hugh

Hugh...were you drinking last night? LOL

We dont do space ships here.... so if you want to do them... I recommend another site.. any other site.. capiche??  You posted this right above a very important 911 video posted by Margaret... that deals in the reality of gravity and is an expert analysis of how that building was demolished!!... it almost appears your posting was intentional, but probably just a coincidence... so, if Margaret doesnt get an apology in 24 hours... well you'll understand... we had a coincidental glitch.... in our membership page... space oddities happen....

==========

Email:  From Hugh to Guy Razer

Sorry, I don't drink.

I was led to believe that this site was about truth.  "No Censoring of Truth!" is the byline of Fighting for Liberty.  It looks to me as though my blog has been censored by removal.  Is this standard practice on this site?  Are dissenting voices silenced here?

My blogs have nothing to do with any of Margaret's blogs, which I haven't read.  The timing and placement of my blogs is also completely independent of her posts.

Your resistance to investigating extraterrestrial phenomena is your own choice, and I don't have a problem with that.  Silencing those that do pursue this investigation is a problem, called censorship.  You are doing the same thing to me that the crooks behind 9/11 do to truthers.  Why?

I understand that you are threatening me with banishment from this site, in particular a banishment made to look like an accident.  How underhanded.  Are you a moderator?  Have I broken some rule?  If so, why wouldn't my banishment be public, with an explanation for public scrutiny?

It would appear that I have to fight for liberty even here, and my oppressor is none other than Guy Razer, the last person I would have suspected of opposing free and open debate on any subject.

Hugh

==========

Do not discuss this or even this, or your entire account on Fighting For Liberty will be deleted.  Long live freedom of speech, a liberty worth fighting for!

K.I.S.S.

K.I.S.S.

That "ignorance is bliss" is so prevalent among humans is a fascinating study in itself.  Why are we so prone to fall into this harmful trap?  The answer is obvious, though we are often too proud to admit it.  We are, in fact, simple-minded creatures.  Our brains are not very good at handling complexity, and the reality of the world is that it is incredibly complex, to the point of being beyond our comprehension.  To cope, the human brain adopts a necessary strategy -- simplify.  A common example of the kind of simplification that our brains employ is the "rule of thumb".  Rather than figure out precisely why something happens, which would require delving into impossible complexity, we look for patterns.  We select and use the most evident patterns to explain what we wish to understand.  Finding patterns is something our brains do relatively well, to the point that we often find patterns that are false and misleading.  This is the inherent danger of simplification -- it usually leads to false and misleading "rules of thumb".  The conundrum is that we are practically forced to simplify, given our feeble brainpower.

Take science as an example.  We tend to think of science as our crowning achievement.  What do humans do when they do science?  They probe the complexity of the world, look for patterns, and try to reduce the patterns into simple formulas.  If those formulas can describe the complexity that we are aware of, we cry "eureka" and claim to have the answer.  Eventually, we discover that there are patterns that we didn't recognize that the formulas can't account for, and we are forced back to the drawing board to address the additional complexity.  Either that or we simply cover up the anomalies and refocus our attention on the successes of our existing paradigm, which is more often the case, and oh so much simpler.  Newton's "law" of gravity is a classic example.  Though the average human can hardly fathom this formula, scientists marvel at its simplicity and usefulness.  Yet human understanding of gravity is woefully inadequate and primitive.  We really don't even know what gravity is.  Alien spacecraft regularly demonstrate a mastery of gravity beyond our simple "rule of thumb".  So what do we do?  We ignore it, we dismiss it, we cover it up, and we point to the successes of our understanding of gravity.  Foolish humans.

The complexity we are faced with is indeed daunting.  We don't even understand ourselves.  For as long as humans have existed, we have tried to understand how our bodies work.  All we have come up with is a progression of less and less ridiculous "rules of thumb".  The average human cannot even fathom the chemistry of the Krebs Cycle (also known as the citric acid cycle), which is only one chemical pathway in the huge symphony of chemical reactions that makes us function.  Is it any wonder that we have been so reliant in the past on the grossest simplification our brains can conceive of, the very epitome of the "ignorance is bliss" philosophy -- that "God" did it?

Battle lines

The sociopath's original motivation.

There are two sides in this long-running battle.  One side vastly outnumbers the other, on the order of 1000 to 1 or better.  For the most part, this horde is completely unorganized with respect to waging battle.  In fact, they aren't even aware that there is a war going on.  They cannot identify the enemy because they don't realize there is an enemy.  They are ignorant, and they are losing.  Because they are oblivious to their gradual defeat, they are very content with the way things currently are.  Their primary concern is their immediate, individual comfort.  These are the "normals".

The other side, though vastly outnumbered, is cunning, clandestine, and well organized.  They are patient, analytical, and unconstrained by moral considerations.  They know their enemy well, having made a science out of studying and experimenting on the horde over the course of many generations.  They are informed, and they are winning.  They are fighting a quiet war with silent weapons against an enemy that they keep in the dark by design.  Their primary concern is their own survival through the control and parasitic exploitation of the "normals".  These are the "deviants", also known as sociopaths.

There are two philosophies at work in this battle.  One is the "ignorance is bliss" mindset, and the other is "the pursuit of truth" philosophy.

The majority of the horde embraces "ignorance is bliss".  Their blissful ignorance keeps them comfortable and content, and it insulates them from becoming aware of the harm they are causing to their continued existence.  Each individual is like a cog in a machine whose ultimate function, unknown to the individual cogs, is to prepare its own destruction.

Most sociopaths embrace "the pursuit of truth".  Their motivation however is power, as they see the possession of truth as a means of manipulating the horde.  For sociopaths, knowledge is power, so they keep the most important knowledge of truth to themselves and withhold it from the horde.  As a result, sociopaths have come to dominate all positions of power, either directly or indirectly.

There are among the horde of "normals" a small minority that reject "ignorance is bliss" and embrace "the pursuit of truth".  That they are a small minority is no coincidence.  For this group to pursue truth requires that they give up commonly held fundamentals like comfort, the certainty of their beliefs, and the approval of their peers.  Their motivation is not to accumulate power to control others, but to benefit the welfare of all people by revealing and ending the exploitation of the sociopaths.  Unfortunately, they are actively targeted by the sociopaths and routinely ridiculed by most "normals", which guarantees their small numbers.

The "ignorance is bliss" philosophy is actually a powerful control mechanism employed by the sociopaths to exploit the masses.  While on its surface it seems harmless, even desirable, the opposite is true.  Consider the following true story, from the family history of a good friend of mine.  Her grandfather was an American homesteader that farmed wheat.  One of the uses of the harvested wheat seed was to produce grain alcohol.  This was during the Prohibition period, so the alcohol had to be made clandestinely, often at night, and it became known as "moonshine".  Hard-working farmers were known to blissfully enjoy the fruits of their labor in this form.  It could also be sold on the black market for a lucrative profit.  As the farmer prospered, his health gradually took a turn for the worse, and a common way to find relief from ailments at that time was to purchase patent medicines, sometimes sold as "snake oil" or "cure-all".  Interestingly enough, the main ingredient of these patent medicines was often moonshine.  As his aches and pains seemed to multiply, the farmer needed more patent medicine to ease his suffering.  Even though the medicine did numb the pain and provide welcome relief, the farmer's condition continued to worsen until his limbs would no longer work.  He became paralyzed and bed-ridden, withered away to skin and bones, and died relatively young.

Unknown to the farmer, his demise was caused by his own "success".  Farmers typically used old car radiators in their homemade stills to condense the alcohol vapors into liquid moonshine.  Those radiators were constructed using lead solder, and the alcohol condensed in those radiators often accumulated harmful amounts of lead.  The farmer, in his blissful ignorance of ingesting moonshine and patent medicines, had unknowingly poisoned himself with a fatal dose of lead.  (Note:  the cause of death in 1922 was diagnosed as pernicious anemia and paralysis -- lead poisoning was not even imagined.)  The poor man's ignorance had indeed been blissful, for a while, but the unrecognized harm resulting from that ignorance had ultimately cut short his life.

Like the wheat farmer, most "normals" have no clue of their approaching demise, or that their own actions are leading them there.  The sociopaths want it that way, because once the population of the "normals" is drastically reduced, the survival and domination of the parasitic sociopaths is much more secure.

Wake up, sheeple.  You had better let go of your comforting illusions and start listening to those annoying truth-seeking "normals".  They are the only ones acting in your best interests.

We be stupid

Hazmat suits to pick up birds killed by fireworks?

I am so, so stupid -- a complete imbecile!  So are you!  At least, that's how the United States government sees us.  That's how it sees the majority of the American public.  And why wouldn't they see us that way?  After all, the U.S. government has gotten away with outrageous lies and uncountable murders for over 50 years!  After the 9/11 incident, they must be thinking we'll believe anything they say, no matter how outrageous.

Here's a good example.  There was a mysterious bird kill in Arkansas involving thousands of birds.  There was also a massive, unexplained fish kill in Arkansas about the same time.  A murdered man's body is discovered in trash being unloaded at a Delaware dump, but no real details are reported in the media.  A spokesperson for the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission claims fireworks were responsible for the bird kill, and that story makes it into the media big-time.  A related story from Sweden involving only 50 birds also claims that fireworks were responsible, and that story also takes a spotlight position in the media.  Lots of entertaining news to be had, right?  So what's the point?

The "real" story (or at least a much more believable one) was released in Europe with roots to Russian intelligence.  There were two "accidents" involving the release of deadly phosgene gas being transported on Air Force aerial tanker/sprayer planes leaving Pine Bluff Arsenal in Arkansas for Afghanistan.  One accident caused the bird kill, the other the fish kill (phosgene is heavier than air and reacts with water to produce hydrochloric acid).  The phosgene gas was apparently going to be quietly used by the U.S. to kill "insurgents" in Afghanistan, in violation of international law.  The murdered man was an outraged biological and chemical weapons expert working for the government that threatened to expose the whole story.  He was silenced in a public way as a warning to any other potential "patriots" with a conscience.  The Swedish story was possibly a psychological operation to lend credence to the absurd fireworks explanation used for the Arkansas bird kill.  After all, it wouldn't do for the public to be aware that the U.S. Air Force operates a fleet of aerial tanker/sprayers in an age of chemtrails, or that inhumane phosgene gas might be clandestinely released by the U.S. in Afghanistan, or that anyone reporting potential war crimes within the government will be murdered with absolute impunity.

Not only am I stupid, but I'm a crazed conspiracy theory nutter!  So is Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and those pesky Russian spies!  At least, that's how the United States government sees us.

The rest of you should be ashamed of your fireworks use.  And pay no attention to the men behind the curtain.

Info Pie - Part 3

Info Pie

The amount of criminal damage that can be accomplished using the Info Pie model is truly mind-boggling. The human mind will actively resist, refusing to believe the facts presented to it. This is another aspect of the positive reinforcement that the Info Pie model generates for itself, which helps maintain the ironclad deception that is its purpose. For example, few will believe that Barry Soetoro, alias Barack Obama, is ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States. The information needed to prove this has been withheld, of course, sealed by a small army of officials that owe their very existence to the controlling Powers-That-Be (PTB) behind the Info Pie. The typical mind won't even consider that such PTB organizations could possibly exist. That information is also withheld, but not with perfect success. There are cracks in the facade that allow some to see past the illusion. Consider this article, for instance. The PTB control the money, and the money controls everything by controlling everybody. Money can buy Presidents, Congressmen, Court Justices, media empires, dictators, countries, revolutions, armies, votes, and almost any kind of cooperation you can imagine. It can also buy assassins, for those rare instances when money won't "talk". Money can essentially buy anything, and the PTB can create all the money they desire. Money is the source of their power, and as long as people will do anything for money, we are complicit in their crimes against humanity, in their crimes against us.

We are killing ourselves by enabling our murderers.